Prosecutors are in trouble after lawyers representing a doctor accused of fraud alleged the U.S. attorney’s office has been stealing documents. In court papers filed May 26, lawyers wrote prosecutors had gained access to discovery of the defense. According to the defense, an informant said an FBI agent had received CDs containing duplicates of discovery files the defense had assembled and scanned. The duplicates were provided by a government-contracted service that makes copies of government discovery documents that defense lawyers want to inspect. The defense said the owner of the service told them in an email that he has routinely provided the FBI with duplicates of the set-aside files. “It appears that this practice of surreptitiously duplicating the discovery work-product of defense counsel in the Southern District of Florida has been the norm for at least the last ten years,” lawyers representing Salo Schapiro, a Broward County doctor charged with health-care fraud, stated in court papers.
The lawyers say the files of documents they selected reveal their pre-trial strategy and qualify as “attorney work product.” As such, they argue, they are shielded under a doctrine that protects legal opinions, conclusions and other trial preparation material from opposing counsel. Mr. Schapiro’s lawyers have asked U.S. District Judge Marcia G. Cooke to dismiss the charges and, short of that, disqualify the entire prosecution team. The Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure provide for wide open discovery, yet an Arizona Judge would never tolerate this, nor should they. Our Rule 26.1 is set up to help find the truth, not misappropriate work product.
At the law firm of William A. Miller, in Phoenix Arizona, we have over 29 years of experience in dealing with dishonest lawyers. A handful have lost their licenses because of our bar complaints. If you are in a legal case and you suspect some lawyer or investigator knows things they should not, do not hesitate to call us at 602-319-6899 to discuss. Our office is conveniently located at 8170 North 86th Place, Suite 208 Scottsdale, Arizona 85258. We take our oath of confidentiality very serious.

We also handle, Breach of contract, Non-compete agreements, Non-disclosure agreements, Employee theft and embezzlement, Insurance purchases and enforcement of policy coverage, Negotiation and/or enforcement of commercial leases, Negligence and gross negligence resulting in losses, Intentional acts causing a company to suffer damages, Tortious interference with contractual relationships, Unjust enrichment, Real Estate fraud, Consumer fraud, Conversion/Theft, Intentional and/or negligent misrepresentation, Business torts and Real estate title and escrow.

Araceli King, a claims specialist from Texas, isn’t a man named Luiz. The distinction is clear. Yet, cable bill collectors, who were under the mistaken impression that she was another person and wouldn’t stop calling her about a late payment. Even after she got on the phone with a representative and explained to them that…

The Mortgage Debt Relief Act of 2007 provided for no income tax to a borrower on any deficiency after a foreclosure or a short sale of a mortgage used to purchase a home, or make improvements to the home. The Act expired December 31, 2013. They used to call these taxable events phantom income. Here’s…

A lawyer (snake) has been sentenced to two years in prison for his role in taking a disabled client of money she was entitled to receive from a $500,000 insurance settlement. He should have received ten years! It’s like the fable of old where the Fox watched the hen house. A sorry joke indeed. Ed…

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Stern v. Marshall (all cites omitted) federal courts have issued differing opinions regarding the range of a bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction to enter final judgments in adversary proceedings. In Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison, looking at Stern, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a bankruptcy court…