On October 15, 2013 after four years plus of bare-knuckle litigation and high stakes legal positioning the investment bankers who financed Ironite have their victory. Case closed.

The law firm of William A. Miller represented these investment bankers when the former operator of Ironite Fertilizer sued them for a host of unfounded claims demanding millions and millions in compensation. William A. Miller fought for the investment bankers from the initial motions, through a brutal discovery schedule and all the way to final disposition.

The case saw five different Maricopa County Superior Court Judges, a highly skilled arbitrator, two hostile white shoe law firms and numerous twists and turns. By the end, the case started looking like a Grisham novel.

The Law Firm of William A. Miller was fortunate to have retired Arizona Supreme Court Justice Thomas Zlaket co-chair significant aspects of the case. The steady hand and wise counsel of Justice Zlaket helped obtain a dismissal of the tort-based claims against the individual investment bankers right before trial.

The docket reads like War and Peace http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CivilCourtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CV2009-023964

The Peace coming when we won in late 2013.

Feel free to call William A. Miller, Esq. 602-319-6899 or email him at bmiller@williamamillerpllc.com.

We also handle, Breach of contract, Non-compete agreements, Non-disclosure agreements, Employee theft and embezzlement, Insurance purchases and enforcement of policy coverage, Negotiation and/or enforcement of commercial leases, Negligence and gross negligence resulting in losses, Intentional acts causing a company to suffer damages, Tortious interference with contractual relationships, Unjust enrichment, Real Estate fraud, Consumer fraud, Conversion/Theft, Intentional and/or negligent misrepresentation, Business torts and Real estate title & escrow.

Just weeks before a scheduled trial, Credit Suisse has reached a $400 million settlement in litigation over the demise of National Century Financial Enterprises. The settlement resolves claims that bondholders were defrauded to the tune of $2 billion when National Century collapsed amid a health-care financing scandal in 2002 — and reportedly brings the bondholders’ total recovery in the case to $1 billion. That is about one half of the loss. 11 years ago, I was the first lawyer to file suit against the perpetrators, including Credit Suisse, in this Ponzi scheme. For a lawyer, being involved in this was like reaching the Super Bowl. We litigated this in Florida, Arizona, Washington DC, New York, Ohio and California. The bad guys went to jail, the lawyers made a bunch of money, the investors got back most of their money and I proved a solo practitioner can fight the big guys. We will be posting key pleadings on this web site soon. This part of the case was covered by Bloomberg.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-14/credit-suisse-to-take-chf134-million-charge-on-ncfe-settlement.html

Call us at 602-319-6899 for further questions.

William A. Miller, Esq. Attorney at Law. 8160 North 86^th Place, suite 208 Scottsdale Arizona 85253.

We also handle, Breach of contract, Non-compete agreements, Non-disclosure agreements, Employee theft and embezzlement, Insurance purchases and enforcement of policy coverage, Negotiation and/or enforcement of commercial leases, Negligence and gross negligence resulting in losses, Intentional acts causing a company to suffer damages, Tortious interference with contractual relationships, Unjust enrichment, Real Estate fraud, Consumer fraud, Conversion/Theft, Intentional and/or negligent misrepresentation, Business torts and Real estate title & escrow.

Back in 2002, when I broke the NCFE billion dollar bond fraud case, I sued Moody’s, Fitch and Standard & Poor’s. Portions of the case have been reported in National Law Books, See Parrett v. Bank One, N.A. (In re Nat’l Century Fin. Enters. Inv. Litig.), 323 F.Supp.2d 861, 878 (S.D. Oh. 2004). My fellow lawyers were suspicious of…

In M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Mueller, 1 CA-CV 10-0804, the Arizona Court of Appeals said that Arizona’s anti-deficiency statute applies to those who buy land with the intent to occupy the property upon completing building a home even if they do not complete construction and actually occupy the property.  In Mueller, the family bought…

Az law scottsdale lawyer good trial lawyer