Real Estate Con Man Phoenix Arizona

The End of National Century

Posted on March 15, 2013 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real Estate

Just weeks before a scheduled trial, Credit Suisse has reached a $400 million settlement in litigation over the demise of National Century Financial Enterprises. The settlement resolves claims that bondholders were defrauded to the tune of $2 billion when National Century collapsed amid a health-care financing scandal in 2002 — and reportedly brings the bondholders’ total recovery in the case to $1 billion. That is about one half of the loss. 11 years ago, I was the first lawyer to file suit against the perpetrators, including Credit Suisse, in this Ponzi scheme. For a lawyer, being involved in this was like reaching the Super Bowl. We litigated this in Florida, Arizona, Washington DC, New York, Ohio and California. The bad guys went to jail, the lawyers made a bunch of money, the investors got back most of their money and I proved a solo practitioner can fight the big guys. We will be posting key pleadings on this web site soon. This part of the case was covered by Bloomberg.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-14/credit-suisse-to-take-chf134-million-charge-on-ncfe-settlement.html

Call us at 602-319-6899 for further questions.

William A. Miller, Esq. Attorney at Law. 8160 North 86th Place, suite 208 Scottsdale Arizona 85253.

We also handle, Breach of contract, Non-compete agreements, Non-disclosure agreements, Employee theft and embezzlement, Insurance purchases and enforcement of policy coverage, Negotiation and/or enforcement of commercial leases, Negligence and gross negligence resulting in losses, Intentional acts causing a company to suffer damages, Tortious interference with contractual relationships, Unjust enrichment, Real Estate fraud, Consumer fraud, Conversion/Theft, Intentional and/or negligent misrepresentation, Business torts and Real estate title & escrow.

How to Sue for Home Defects

Posted on March 6, 2013 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real Estate

At the Law Firm of William A. Miller located in Scottsdale Arizona we are often asked to represent buyers who purchased defective homes.

Here is a simple legal analysis we perform:

What is the timing?

The statute of limitations for breach of a written contract is six years from the date that the breach occurred. See A.R.S. §12-548.  This six-year statute also applies to claims by both the original buyer and subsequent buyers against homebuilders for breach of the contractual implied warranty of proper construction, but this claim is limited to no more than eight years after completion of the home, no matter when the construction defect was discovered.  A.R.S. §12-552.  The statute of limitations for fraud is generally three years from when the fraud was discovered. A.R.S. §12-543.  The statute of limitations for negligence is generally two years from when the negligence was discovered.  A.R.S. §12-542.

Who pays for this loss?

A winning party is entitled to attorneys fees in breach of contract and in fraud claims.  In negligence claims, however, no fees are awarded. So, sue for contract breach! The homebuilder may be liable to the buyer for breach of the contractual implied warranty if there was improper construction.  The buyer would have four more years under the eight-year limitation to file a claim against the homebuilder because the home was built four years ago.  The buyer should be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees under A.R.S. §12-341.01.

What do the Forms say?

Under the Arizona Association of REALTORS® purchase contract the seller has a contractual duty to disclose to the buyer known defects in the home.  If the seller knew of the defect the buyer would have six years after discovery of the defects to file a claim for breach of written contract against the seller. Finally, the buyer would only have three years to file a fraud claim against the seller, but should be entitled to attorneys fees for prosecuting this fraud claim.

Can we shotgun (sue everyone) this?

Buyers are always upset with the brokers in these cases. Remember, the real estate brokers were not parties to the purchase contract.  Therefore, there is no breach of contract claim and the buyer would only have three years to prosecute a claim against the brokers for any fraudulent non-disclosure, and only two years to prosecute a claim for any negligent non-disclosure, i.e., the brokers should have known of the defects.   Good luck with that one. If the real estate brokers knew of, and fraudulently failed to disclose the defect, the buyer is entitled to attorneys fees.  If the real estate brokers were only negligent, i.e., should have known of the defective roof, the buyer is not entitled to attorneys fees.

Call us at 602-319-6899 for further questions.

William A. Miller, Esq. Attorney at Law. 8160 North 86th Place, suite 208 Scottsdale Arizona 85253.

We also handle, Breach of contract, Non-compete agreements, Non-disclosure agreements, Employee theft and embezzlement, Insurance purchases and enforcement of policy coverage, Negotiation and/or enforcement of commercial leases, Negligence and gross negligence resulting in losses, Intentional acts causing a company to suffer damages, Tortious interference with contractual relationships, Unjust enrichment, Real Estate fraud, Consumer fraud, Conversion/Theft, Intentional and/or negligent misrepresentation, Business torts and Real estate title & escrow.

Investor Loss? Another Deep Pocket to Sue

Posted on January 7, 2013 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real Estate

Back in 2002, when I broke the NCFE billion dollar bond fraud case, I sued Moody’s, Fitch and Standard & Poor’s. Portions of the case have been reported in National Law Books, See Parrett v. Bank One, N.A. (In re Nat’l Century Fin. Enters. Inv. Litig.), 323 F.Supp.2d 861, 878 (S.D. Oh. 2004).

My fellow lawyers were suspicious of such claims because, most efforts to hold ratings agencies liable for the financial crisis have failed, but on Thursday two institutional investors got the green light to go to trial with claims that they were misled by the top ratings that Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch gave to a $1.1 billion structured investment vehicle called Rhinebridge. District judge Shira Scheindlin in Manhattan also allowed the plaintiffs to proceed with their claims against Morgan Stanley, which structured and marketed Rhinebridge. We were right all along!

At the Arizona Law Firm of William A. Miller we handle this type of claim for investor loss. Call us at 602-319-6899 or visit us at 8170 North 86th Place Scottsdale, Arizona 85258. We have been representing victims of Fraud for 25 years.

We also handle, Breach of contract, Non-compete agreements, Non-disclosure agreements, Employee theft and embezzlement, Insurance purchases and enforcement of policy coverage, Negotiation and/or enforcement of commercial leases, Negligence and gross negligence resulting in losses, Intentional acts causing a company to suffer damages, Tortious interference with contractual relationships, Unjust enrichment, Real Estate fraud, Consumer fraud, Conversion/Theft, Intentional and/or negligent misrepresentation, Business torts and Real estate title & escrow.

Arizona- Title to Property

Posted on December 19, 2012 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real Estate

COMMUNITY PROPERTY: Arizona is a community property state. There is a statutory presumption that all property acquired by husband and wife is community property.  Community property is a method of co-ownership for married persons only.  Upon death of one of the spouses, the deceased spouse’s interest will pass by either a will or intestate succession….

Read More

Mortgage Foreclosure Settlement

Posted on February 15, 2012 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real Estate

Some folks love and others hate the recent $25-billion federal-state mortgage foreclosure settlement, but there’s no getting around one huge and significant issue: Besides, prolonging the crisis, there’s a large, sink hole right in the middle of it. The hole is that if your home loan has been bought from your lender by Fannie Mae…

Read More

Those who Teach…

Posted on September 19, 2011 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real Estate

Az law scottsdale lawyer good trial lawyer

Read More

Say it. Don’t Spray it!

Posted on February 17, 2011 in Arizona Law Regarding Business Disputes

When I was a kid, Mr. Winn, my 5th grade teacher would say… “Say it. Don’t spray it!” We all knew what he meant. I just put up about 25 pleadings from the Mortgages Limited fiasco.  The Sierra club will go nuts on how many trees we will kill in this case. Note, the lawyers…

Read More

Who’s on First

Posted on August 20, 2010 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real Estate

Mortgages bundled into securities were a favorite trick of Wall Street at the height of the big bubble. The securities changed hands frequently, the French bought billions, and the investment banks profiting from mortgage payments were often not the same parties that made the loans. At the heart of this disconnect was the Mortgage Electronic…

Read More

A Ship without a Sail

Posted on June 2, 2009 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real Estate

I just finished lunch with one of the smartest and richest guys in Paradise Valley, Arizona. He knows I am writing this post as he teased me about being silent the last few weeks. I told him I was WORKING on legal briefs and I did not have time to blog about the Arizona legal…

Read More

Money is Green

Posted on March 2, 2009 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real Estate

Why are all the con men now “going green”? Pretty simple. These are the same type of idiots and narcissistic jerks who polluted our rivers in the 1940-50’s. It is where the money is. It is easy money because there are no rules. It is a brand new industry and language and the best B.S….

Read More
© Copyright 2008 William A. Miller, Esq., All Rights Reserved