Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real Estate
Builder be Aware
Posted on July 11, 2014 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real EstateHome Builder be Aware!
On April 22nd, 2014, HB 2018 was signed into law by Arizona Governor, Jan Brewer. The bill will amend two key anti-deficiency statutes, A.R.S. §§ 33-729 and 33-814, the former relating to judicial foreclosures and the latter to non-judicial foreclosures. Borrowers have relied upon both of these statutes in order to avoid liability on mortgages or deeds of trust after foreclosure. On top of amending the statutes, HB 2018 also includes additional provisions to both of the statutes; the provisions serve to elucidate and limit anti-deficiency protections for borrowers on all mortgages and deeds of trust executed after December 31, 2014.
Deficiency protections for commercial homebuilders, who receive loans for the purpose of constructing new homes to sell but the homes are not completed or occupied at the time of foreclosure, will be eliminated by the amendments to A.R.S. §§ 33-729 and 33-814. Should the property under consideration never be completed or actually made use of by the borrower, the amendments also clarify that the borrower is not entitled to anti-deficiency protection.
The amendments will give more guarantees to lenders for loans to commercial and residential homebuilders, even though there has been a downward trend in underwater mortgages over the past couple years.
We have represented many home builders over the years, if you have questions about this new law give Bill Miller a call at 602-31-6899 or stop by the office at 8170 North 86th Place, Suite 208 Scottsdale, AZ 85253.
Securities Fraud + Class Action = Alive and well.
Posted on July 6, 2014 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real EstateThe Supreme Court made it harder for investors to band together to pursue class action claims that they were misled when they bought or sold securities. But the justices did not accept a broader challenge, one that could have put an end to most class actions for securities fraud. So, as we say, class actions regarding securities claims are still alive.
The Wall Street bunch expressed tempered enthusiasm for the decision, calling it a small step.
“While today’s decision inches toward bringing securities law back in line with the ordinary rules for proving fraud cases, much more can and should be done,” said Lily Claffee, general counsel of the United States Chamber of Commerce.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the majority in a unanimous decision that split 6 to 3 on its rationales, said that defendants facing class actions might try to show at an early stage that their statements did not affect their securities’ market price.
The decision, in a case involving the oil services company Halliburton, will cut back on suits that can involve enormous sums. Settlements involving companies and investors over the last decade have totaled about $62 billion, with about $10.5 billion of that amount going to plaintiffs’ lawyers, according to a report from NERA, an economic consulting firm.
While we do not pursue class actions at the Law Firm of William A. Miller, we know plenty of big time firms that do, so if you think you have a securities’ case, call Bill Miller at 602.319.6899. We handle individual claims before the Federal District Court, Maricopa County Superior Court, FINRA and the AAA.
Landlord Liability for Tenant Acts
Posted on July 31, 2013 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real EstateIf a landlord knew or should have known of activities by the tenant that could cause a danger or nuisance, i.e., damage to neighbors, to surrounding property owners, or even to a passerby, then the landlord can be held liable for tenant bad acts. See Klimkowski v. De La Torre, 175 Ariz. 340 (1993).
In the Klimkowski case our court ruled that the landlord knew or should have known of the tenants’ recklessness with regard to gasoline and incendiary devices on the rental property. Therefore, the landlord was liable for damage caused by an explosion on the rental property. As to ‘should have known’, real estate investors who own rental property should regularly visit the rental property to assess the condition of the rental property and confirm that the tenants are not committing bad acts.
We have worked with landlords all over Arizona to help them assess and reduce potential liability. Please call us at 602-319-6899 to discuss any real estate questions.
Lerner v. DMD Realty. LLC
Posted on June 10, 2013 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real EstateIn the Lerner case, 648 Ariz. Adv. Rep 35 (CA 1, 11/27/12) the Arizona Court of Appeals continued to uphold the stigmatized property statute. The statute gives non disclosure bogie’s. It limits the things that MUST be disclosed and cuts off liability for other non disclosures that common sense would suggest need be disclosed. ie….
Read MoreYour Word is Your Bond
Posted on March 21, 2013 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real EstateIt’s hard to figure out why lawyers will not quote what the cost of a suit will be. While, variables do exist, your lawyer should know what these variables might be. That can be factored in. Well, the legal marketplace is changing, and companies are now demanding value-based engagements with their outside firms that create…
Read MoreThe End of National Century
Posted on March 15, 2013 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real EstateJust weeks before a scheduled trial, Credit Suisse has reached a $400 million settlement in litigation over the demise of National Century Financial Enterprises. The settlement resolves claims that bondholders were defrauded to the tune of $2 billion when National Century collapsed amid a health-care financing scandal in 2002 — and reportedly brings the bondholders’…
Read MoreHow to Sue for Home Defects
Posted on March 6, 2013 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real EstateAt the Law Firm of William A. Miller located in Scottsdale Arizona we are often asked to represent buyers who purchased defective homes. Here is a simple legal analysis we perform: What is the timing? The statute of limitations for breach of a written contract is six years from the date that the breach occurred….
Read MoreInvestor Loss? Another Deep Pocket to Sue
Posted on January 7, 2013 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real EstateBack in 2002, when I broke the NCFE billion dollar bond fraud case, I sued Moody’s, Fitch and Standard & Poor’s. Portions of the case have been reported in National Law Books, See Parrett v. Bank One, N.A. (In re Nat’l Century Fin. Enters. Inv. Litig.), 323 F.Supp.2d 861, 878 (S.D. Oh. 2004). My fellow lawyers were suspicious of…
Read MoreArizona- Title to Property
Posted on December 19, 2012 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real EstateCOMMUNITY PROPERTY: Arizona is a community property state. There is a statutory presumption that all property acquired by husband and wife is community property. Community property is a method of co-ownership for married persons only. Upon death of one of the spouses, the deceased spouse’s interest will pass by either a will or intestate succession….
Read MoreArizona Anti-deficiency law
Posted on February 27, 2012 in Arizona Law Regarding Business and Real EstateIn M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Mueller, 1 CA-CV 10-0804, the Arizona Court of Appeals said that Arizona’s anti-deficiency statute applies to those who buy land with the intent to occupy the property upon completing building a home even if they do not complete construction and actually occupy the property. In Mueller, the family bought…
Read More